Sunday, November 13, 2011

The Journalism that Jars


Yesterday, I was watching the news on Zee News at 10 PM in Hindi. And it had its presenter: Punya Prasoon Bajpai.

There was news on the nose-diving plight of the Kingfisher Airlines. The presenter briefed about the news to the audience and entailed how the crony capitalism has been responsible for the deplorable state of the airline.
Mr. Bajpai was rubbing his palms frequently (that can be termed as his style) and making all roundabout sentences that he is famous for to make the audience understand the occult reality behind the Kingfisher’s plight.

What amazed me was the insensitivity with which he presented the news. He even sprinkled his inopportune smile on the news as well. Though his rubbing palms and inappropriate smile may sound natural and appropriate to many of his regular audiences, but to me it seemed out of the place.

 I mean as a news presenter he should be aware of the fact that such news has two aspects. One is related with the newswallahs being excited about being able to understand the nitty- gritty of a situation (good or bad) that is transpiring or transpired and other aspect is about those people who get affected by the activities related to the situation (news).

What I am trying to say is that when there are talks in the air about the Kingfisher Airlines being on the verge of shutting down, it directly means that there are people who will lose jobs. And such news should be tackled with utter care that it doesn’t hurt when it is informing.

I know that I am not a part of the intelligentsia that these senior journalists are, still I am of the opinion that such news demand sober and sensitive attitude. Patrakarita (Journalism) is not about only informing but also about how it is informing. Feeling elated that you have presented the news and used all your trademark sentences (without caring whether they are intelligible or not) is doing injustice to the responsibilities attached to presenting a news.

Digital age journalists should understand that it is not the omniscient-beard or the squeaky-clean suits that make a presenter worthwhile the job but the attitude adopted towards presenting the news-piece.

I think that the race of TRPs have squeezed the anxiety and restlessness (that a gloomy situation engenders) from the minds of people who were once regarded as thinkers on social upheavals (developments).

P.S: I don’t have anyone, be they relatives or friends, in the Kingfisher Airlines. I don’t have anything against Mr. Punya Prasoon Bajpai at personal level either. The views are just the outcome of the observation of a situation.

12 comments:

  1. well said
    i guess every side has two coins...
    media needs TRP to survive...
    at the same time our media has lot more freedom than countries like China... which is good at times...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Reminds me of Shammi Narang and the likes who were supposed to read news with blank face. I think, it was better done that way.

    On the other hand, about the kingfisher issue, I think Mallaya is playing smart here!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well said, Neeraj! But I feel that's the case now almost everywhere. Donno about what they (journalists) genuinely think inside. There's no emotion attached, everything is just a News.

    Thanks for your visit and words of inspiration.
    Regards
    Deepa
    http://deepazworld.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  4. @SUB:Yes,we have freedom and we must use it efficiently to extract maximum benefit out of this. Thanx for ur comments SUB!
    @Chintan:Yes,that is also a reality of the private players of India. Thanx for commenting Chintan.
    @Deepazartz:Thanx for visiting Deepa. You have a wonderful fingers that paint and write wonderfully.

    ReplyDelete
  5. yes sometimes the presenters can be quite insensitive and look at it very narrowly

    ReplyDelete
  6. @Sujatha: Thanx for commenting Sujatha.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Media sells everything, let it be the 'good' news or the 'bad' news. That's the ugly face of media. Nice post!!!

    From: www.sriramnivas.com

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Sri: Thax for ur visit and comments Sri.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Most news channels have pretty much proved that it's just about TRPs. I'm not sure if we can blame them for that (given that they depend on ads which depend on TRPs for their revenue), but frankly they've really sunk too low.

    Nice post.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Shreya: Thanx Shreya for visiting and commenting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Media loves hyperbole! There is always good and bad to it! You have written it well.

    Love
    http://www.meghasarin.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. @ Megha: Thanx Megha for your appreciative comment.

    ReplyDelete